The Legal Herald Logo
Legal Analysis By Attorneys
Breaking Legal News

Springfield, MO - Shooting Outside of Conoco Village Mart Leaves One Man Dead

Springfield, MO - Shooting Outside of Conoco Village Mart Leaves One Man Dead
Published: August 25, 2021
By: Darla Medina
Last Updated on August 25, 2021

One Killed in Shooting at Conoco Village Mart

According to AP News, a man was shot outside of the Conoco Village Mart located at 2720 W Kearney St, Springfield, MO 65803. 

On August 13, 2021, police arrived at the scene at around 2 p.m. to find a victim in his truck with a gunshot wound. He was transported to the hospital but died later that day. 

Police say that the suspected shooter was 22-year-old Garrett Austin Eagle. The incident is still being investigated, but Eagle is facing charges of second-degree murder, robbery, unlawful use of a weapon, in addition to two counts of armed criminal action. 

Ryan Frazier Missouri Personal Injury Attorney
Hi, I’m attorney Ryan Frazier. I’m a lawyer in Missouri, and if you or a loved one were injured in an accident, I’d be happy to discuss your legal options in a free consultation, call us today.
(888) 997-3792

Legal Options of Victims Shot at a Convenience Store

Attorney contributor Ryan Frazier is an experienced violent crime lawyer who has represented numerous shootings in civil lawsuits. During an interview, Ryan highlighted legal options for victims of convenience store shootings.

"Convenience store owners have a legal obligation to upkeep a safe environment for those in and around the property. In order to maintain safety, store owners should implement adequate safety measures, which can include strong lighting and surveillance cameras. Suppose a convenience store owner does not maintain an adequate level of safety and a violent crime occurs, such as a shooting. In that case, the owner may be held liable for negligent security."

"If a victim is shot at a convenience store, they have legal grounds to question if the store owner did everything possible to prevent the crime from happening. If the owners have failed to exercise reasonable care, the owner could be considered liable. Additionally, if a crime is found to be reasonably foreseeable, the property owner could be held liable. One example of a foreseeable crime would include if crime rates in the area increased, but security measures on the property did not. Victims of convenience store shootings and their families should explore the services of an experienced violent crime lawyer to learn all their legal options. In cases of negligence, they may have grounds for a civil lawsuit which could include financial compensation."

Sources:

AP News

News Leader

Got A Tip Or Questions 
About A Story?
Call Us!
The Legal Herald
888-997-3792
About the Author
Darla Medina
About Darla Medina
Editor: Darla is a content writer with a focus on the legal field. She covers cases of sexual abuse, drunk driving, and preventable violent crime for the Legal Herald. Contact Darla: darla@eaglepeakmarketing.com This article was fact checked prior to publishing by this author to ensure compliance with our rigorous editorial standards. We will only use authoritative sources. Our values compel us to provide only trustworthy information. If you find an error, please contact us.
Read some recent posts
Find A Local Lawyer

  • Details
  • Incident

Find A Local Lawyer

Want To Contribute Breaking News? 
Contact Us Today
Legal Herald Logoinfo@legalherald.com
10355 Kensington Shore Dr. #102
Orlando, FL 32827
Call: (888) 997-3792
© 2020 The Legal Herald, a division of Eagle Peak Marketing, LLC. All rights reserved.

We would like our readers to know that the information in this story may be sourced from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will correct them if and when they are brought to our attention or we discover them through our editing process. If you have any concerns about this post, please contact us immediately and we will rectify issues. DISCLAIMER: The material contained in this post is for general informational purposes. It is not intended to constitute or express legal or medical advice. Any laws referenced herein are substantially based on general legal principles and may not be applicable to your particular situation. Laws can often be different from one jurisdiction to the next. The Legal Herald is not a law firm. Law firms and lawyers from around the country may apply to become a sponsor or contributor to The Legal Herald.
SitemapMedia RoomDisclaimer / Terms Of Service & Privacy Policy