The Legal Herald Logo
Legal Analysis By Attorneys
Breaking Legal News

San Diego, CA - One Dead Following Shooting at Dave & Busters Arcade

Published: July 7, 2021
By: Darla Medina
Last Updated on July 7, 2021

Shooting at Dave & Busters Leaves One Man Dead

According to NBC San Diego, a shooting occurred on June 17th at the Dave & Busters Arcade located at 2931 Camino Del Rio North San Diego, CA 92108. 

Police were called to the scene just before 11 pm at the San Diego Dave & Busters to find many patrons running from the restaurant. Upon entry to the incident scene, they found one victim with a gunshot wound to the chest. 

The victim, a 28-year-old male, was transported to the hospital but later was confirmed dead by the San Diego Police Department Seargent. 

The suspect has not been caught, and witnesses reported them fleeing in a dark SUV. Any information is being accepted by the Homicide Unit of the San Diego Police Department. 

Bobby Thompson, Esq. California Lawyer - Legal Herald
Hi, I’m attorney Bobby Thompson. I’m a lawyer here in California and if you or a loved one were injured in an accident, I’d be happy to discuss your legal options. Call me on the number below. It costs nothing, and it would be my honor to help you.
(888) 997-3792

Legal Rights of Victims Shot at Restaurants

Attorney contributor Bobby Thompson is an experienced violent crimes attorney licensed in California. Bobby has represented numerous shooting victims and their families in civil lawsuits. In an interview, we asked Bobby to share some insight on the legal rights of shooting victims at restaurants.

"Private property owners, such as restaurant owners, have a legal obligation to maintain the safety of people on their property. To protect their customers, restaurant owners should implement security measures to provide a level of safety. For example, cameras could be installed inside and outside of the property. In instances where the crime rate in the region is rising, so should the amount of security being offered by the establishment. If property owners do not provide sufficient security and someone is harmed, they could be deemed liable in a civil lawsuit."

"Victims and their family should question if adequate security measures were in fact taken at the time of an incident. In addition to inadequate security, the crime must be considered reasonably foreseeable for a victim to have the necessary grounds for a lawsuit against the property owner. A reasonably foreseeable crime happens on a property with a previous history of violent crime, and the owner did nothing to improve the establishment's security. If a victim or the family of a victim wishes to learn more about their rights, they should seek the counsel of an experienced violent crime attorney."

Sources:

NBC San Diego

Got A Tip Or Questions 
About A Story?
Call Us!
The Legal Herald
888-997-3792
About the Author
Darla Medina
About Darla Medina
Editor: Darla is a content writer with a focus on the legal field. She covers cases of sexual abuse, drunk driving, and preventable violent crime for the Legal Herald. Contact Darla: [email protected] This article was fact checked prior to publishing by this author to ensure compliance with our rigorous editorial standards. We will only use authoritative sources. Our values compel us to provide only trustworthy information. If you find an error, please contact us.
Read some recent posts
  • Details
  • Incident

Find A Local Lawyer

Want To Contribute Breaking News? 
Contact Us Today
Legal Herald Logo[email protected]
10355 Kensington Shore Dr. #102
Orlando, FL 32827
Call: (888) 997-3792
© 2020 The Legal Herald, a division of Eagle Peak Marketing, LLC. All rights reserved.

We would like our readers to know that the information in this story may be sourced from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will correct them if and when they are brought to our attention or we discover them through our editing process. If you have any concerns about this post, please contact us immediately and we will rectify issues. DISCLAIMER: The material contained in this post is for general informational purposes. It is not intended to constitute or express legal or medical advice. Any laws referenced herein are substantially based on general legal principles and may not be applicable to your particular situation. Laws can often be different from one jurisdiction to the next. The Legal Herald is not a law firm. Law firms and lawyers from around the country may apply to become a sponsor or contributor to The Legal Herald.
SitemapMedia RoomDisclaimer / Terms Of Service & Privacy Policy