According to The New York Times, Pornhub’s website consists of sexual assaults of children. Allegedly the site is filled with rape videos, and there are search codes to find child sex videos.
Pornhub allows the public to post videos and download them from the website, making it challenging for viewers and Pornhub to know someone’s age in a video. Therefore, no one is aware of how much illegal content is on Pornhub. However, since Pornhub allows downloads, even if a video is removed, the video may still be uploaded again.
Videos of alleged assault on the site include unconscious women and girls. The other person in these videos opens these women and girls’ eyelids and touches their eyeballs to show they’re unresponsive. Other videos include alleged gang rape of teens. Most underage content posted involved teenagers, but spy cams show children as young as 8 to 12 years old.
Some alleged victim stories highlighted by The New York Times:
The New York Times highlighted many who shared their stories do not want Pornhub to stop streaming but to stop promoting and allowing videos of underaged children and rape on their site. Pornhub has denied direct comment but claims they do not support underage children’s videos and have moderators to seek out these videos and remove them.
Attorney contributor Guy D'Andrea, an experienced sex abuse lawyer, has represented numerous victims of sex abuse and sex trafficking. Below Brian provided commentary on the legal rights of victims sexually trafficked or assaulted on a pornography site.
"Pornographic websites have a legal obligation to protect the people uploaded onto the site. To ensure the safety and legal content on their sites, these companies must monitor the videos posted to ensure they comply with the law and not promote sexual abuse. Unfortunately, we have seen on various websites sexual predators abusing underaged teens and unconscious women. These predators abuse their power over those in vulnerable positions and often post pornographic videos without the other person’s consent. Companies must protect those posted and ensure consent to the best of their ability."
"Victims should ask if the company did their best to prevent sexual abuse from occurring and did their best preventing the video from being posted. If not, the victim may have grounds for a civil lawsuit against the company for negligence. An example of negligence is if previous users uploaded inappropriate videos, but that user is still permitted to post. Another example of negligence is if the company is aware of rape or underaged videos on the site but does not immediately take them down. In such cases, the company could be deemed negligent."
"If pornographic companies do not increase preventative measures to ensure inappropriate videos are not posted, the company may be considered negligent in the sex abuse crimes on their sites. Examples of preventative measures would be easy reporting systems and better screenings for inappropriate videos. Companies have an obligation to monitor videos and be aware of the abuse. If a company is found negligent, the victim has ground for a civil lawsuit. Victims should acquire the services of an experienced sex abuse lawyer to explore all their legal options. Victims should know they may be eligible to receive compensation for damages."