The Legal Herald Logo
Legal Analysis By Attorneys
Breaking Legal News

East Liberty, PA - Former Priest of the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, Paul Spisak, Arrested Again For Filming a Child in a Target Bathroom Stall

East Liberty, PA - Former Priest of the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, Paul Spisak, Arrested Again For Filming a Child in a Target Bathroom Stall
Published: January 6, 2022
By: Darla Medina
Last Updated on January 6, 2022

Catholic Priest Arrested Again For Allegedly Filming Child in Bathroom Stall

The Pittsburg Post-Gazette has reported that a former priest has been arrested for filling a teen boy under a bathroom stall at the East Liberty Target located at 6231 Penn Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15206. 

Court documents revealed that on Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 77-year-old Paul George Spisak was arrested for filming a 13-year-old boy through a crack in the bathroom stall in the department store. Spisak, a former priest of the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, attempted to flee before being apprehended by an officer. At first, he denied the allegation but later admitted to filming the child without his permission. Spisak also admitted to having additional photos of other male victims.  

A History of Sexual Misconduct

According to the Survivors Network, SNAP, this is not the first time Spisak has been charged with sexual misconduct. As far back as 1998, the former Catholic priest was accused of possessing pornographic magazines, tapes, and internet material that depicted sexual activity. These included sexual acts of both homosexual and sadomasochistic natures. The staff alleged that Spisak also had multiple pictures of boys as young as 15 with their buttocks showing. The staff member's son also accused the former priest of inappropriately fondling him during a summer trip. An investigation by the Diocese found that Spisak had:

  • "sexual and interpersonal issues"
  • "been diagnosed as having a sexual disorder"
  • "significant interest in grade school age males"

Despite these findings and requests by multiple Diocese members, he was reassigned to St. Mary of Mercy with his duties expanded. 

In 2002, Spisak resigned from his role as a priest due to personal reasons. However, the Diocese officially prohibited his return to the priesthood in 2003, to the sexual abuse allegations.

In 2006, he was arrested and pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct. He was forced to pay a $300 fine and provide a letter from his therapist stating his therapy was ongoing. Police reports, obtained by Special Agents in the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General in 2017, noted that a complaint was filed against Spisak for using a camera to record a man's buttocks. As he was being questioned by security, he pretended to be sick and flushed the memory card in the toilet. During an interview with police in 2017, he admitted to recording the victim and that he had a "sexual fixation with the male buttocks."

Brian Kent - Attorney
Hi. I am attorney Brian Kent. If you or a loved one were injured or killed in a similar incident, I would be happy to speak with you and discuss your options.
Call the number below. It would be my honor to help you. Consultations are free.
(888) 997-3792

Legal Recourse For Victims of Sexual Misconduct by a Priest

Attorney contributor Brian Kent is an experienced sexual abuse victim lawyer in the state of Pennsylvania. Brian represents victims of sexual abuse and their families in civil lawsuits. In an interview, we asked Brian to share his thoughts regarding the rights of victims sexually abused by a priest.

“Too often, sexual predators take positions of trust and power in a religious organization with the intent to commit abuse. These predators gain the trust of both victims and their parents, in addition to their parish. This exploitation has plagued all religious organizations, including the Catholic Diocese, as numerous religious leaders have been charged with sexually abusing congregation members. Churches and their officials are legally obligated to do their best to keep their member’s safety a top priority by implementing preventatives to reduce predators within the organization. This may entail conducting background checks on all members, installing security throughout the property, and by taking reports of misconduct seriously. Failure to have safety measures in place can lead to the religious organization being held accountable for the abuse that takes place.”

“A church and its religious officials can be held liable for not upholding the safety of its members. Many times sexual abuse and misconduct only occur due to negligence of the religious organization. One such example might include if reports or complaints were filed against an active clergy member, yet the religious officials ignored the allegations. In cases of church negligence, the religious organization may be considered negligent and victims, along with their families, may have grounds for a lawsuit.”

Sources:

SNAP

Pittsburg Post-Gazette

Got A Tip Or Questions 
About A Story?
Call Us!
The Legal Herald
888-997-3792
About the Author
Darla Medina
About Darla Medina
Editor: Darla is a content writer with a focus on the legal field. She covers cases of sexual abuse, drunk driving, and preventable violent crime for the Legal Herald. Contact Darla: [email protected] This article was fact checked prior to publishing by this author to ensure compliance with our rigorous editorial standards. We will only use authoritative sources. Our values compel us to provide only trustworthy information. If you find an error, please contact us.
Read some recent posts

  • Details
  • Incident

Find A Local Lawyer

Want To Contribute Breaking News? 
Contact Us Today
Legal Herald Logo[email protected]
10355 Kensington Shore Dr. #102
Orlando, FL 32827
Call: (888) 997-3792
© 2020 The Legal Herald, a division of Eagle Peak Marketing, LLC. All rights reserved.

We would like our readers to know that the information in this story may be sourced from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will correct them if and when they are brought to our attention or we discover them through our editing process. If you have any concerns about this post, please contact us immediately and we will rectify issues. DISCLAIMER: The material contained in this post is for general informational purposes. It is not intended to constitute or express legal or medical advice. Any laws referenced herein are substantially based on general legal principles and may not be applicable to your particular situation. Laws can often be different from one jurisdiction to the next. The Legal Herald is not a law firm. Law firms and lawyers from around the country may apply to become a sponsor or contributor to The Legal Herald.
SitemapMedia RoomDisclaimer / Terms Of Service & Privacy Policy